Key Takeaways
- Disenfranchised grief occurs when society does not validate or recognize a person’s loss.
- Non-death losses, such as career changes or pet loss, are legitimate forms of mourning.
- Moving from passive grieving to active mourning is necessary for reconciliation.
Okay so here's something that still gets under my skin, even after doing this work for over a decade.
I was sitting across from a woman — mid-40s, sharp dresser, totally put-together on the outside — and she was telling me about her cat. Oscar. A tabby. Fourteen years they'd had together. She'd found him as a kitten behind a Denny's in 2011, if I'm remembering right, and he'd slept on her pillow every single night since.
Oscar died on a Tuesday. She missed three days of work.
And when she finally — finally — opened up to a colleague about why she'd been such a wreck, the response was (and I'm paraphrasing but barely): "Oh. It was just a cat though, right? You can get another one."
She shut down. Completely. Didn't mention Oscar to anyone for months after that. She sat in my office convinced there was something fundamentally broken inside her because she couldn't stop crying over, quote, "just an animal."
Nothing broken. Not even close.
What she was dealing with is called disenfranchised grief, and honestly? It's one of the cruelest things we do to each other without even realizing it.
The term sounds clinical but the feeling isn't
Kenneth Doka coined it — he's a bereavement researcher, been doing this since before I was born — and his definition boils down to grief that society won't let you have. Grief that "cannot be openly acknowledged, publicly mourned, or socially supported." Which, if you strip away the academic language, just means: the world decided your pain doesn't matter.
And that's where it gets really nasty. Because now you've got two problems instead of one.
You're hurting. That's problem one. Fine. Grief does that. But then there's this whole second thing layered on top — this creeping shame, this voice in your head going am I being dramatic? Should I be over this already? What's wrong with me?
That second thing? It makes the first thing so much worse. I can't overstate that.
The APA published data showing something like one in five bereaved adults end up meeting the clinical criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder. One in five! And the risk shoots up — way up — when somebody feels like they can't talk about their loss. When there's no funeral to attend. No sympathy cards trickling in. No casseroles on the porch. Just... silence. And you, alone with it.
The stuff people don't think "counts"
Right, so this is the elephant in the room. When I say disenfranchised grief, most people's brains go straight to pet loss. Fair enough. But it's so much bigger than that, and this is where things get messy.
Your ex dies and you're not "supposed" to care. I had a guy come in — married to his wife for twelve years, divorced for five — and she died in a car accident on I-95 outside of Hartford. He was a wreck. Couldn't eat. Couldn't function. And everyone around him kept saying variations of "but you were divorced" like a legal document just... deletes twelve years of memories? Of inside jokes and Christmas mornings and fighting about the thermostat? Come on. Grief doesn't check whether you've filed paperwork. Same exact thing happens with estranged parents, by the way. People who haven't spoken to their dad in six years and then he dies and it hits them like a freight train and they don't understand why. But I do. The grief isn't just about who that person was at the end — it's about who they were supposed to be, and every version of the relationship that'll never get a second chance now.
Losses that have nothing to do with death. This one trips people up. Getting laid off from a job you'd had for 15 years. A miscarriage at 11 weeks. Your best friend since college just... stops returning your calls one day and you never find out why. Retirement, even — and yeah, I know that sounds ridiculous, but I've watched it destroy people who built their entire identity around their work. Moving away from a neighborhood. Losing your health. These are real losses. Your nervous system doesn't give a damn about the difference — a broken bond is a broken bond, full stop. But try explaining to your brother-in-law at Thanksgiving that you're grieving a job. See how that lands.
Kids and old people — the two groups everyone forgets about. We exclude children from funerals all the time, did you know that? I find this baffling. The logic is supposedly "it'll traumatize them" or "they won't understand." Meanwhile, six-year-old Sophia knows something terrible happened, nobody will explain it, and she's processing the whole thing alone in her bedroom with zero tools and zero vocabulary for what she's feeling. Great job, adults. And on the other end — when you're 85 and your wife of sixty years dies, somehow people think you should handle it better because you're older? As if six decades of shared life makes the empty chair at breakfast easier? I genuinely don't understand where that logic comes from.
Deaths that carry a whisper. Overdose. Suicide. AIDS. I'm just going to say it plainly: if someone you loved died from one of these, you already know what I'm talking about and I don't need to spell it out. The grief is hard enough. The judgment from other people about how the person died — that's the part that makes it unbearable. And that shame, that pressure to stay quiet, that's a direct highway to complicated grief which is a whole separate beast and much, much harder to climb out of once it takes hold.
Can we talk about the internet for a second?
This is something I've been chewing on for a while because it keeps coming up with people I work with and I don't think our culture has caught up to it yet.
People build real relationships online. I'm not talking about casual follows — I mean actual, genuine, talk-every-day friendships. Guild mates in an MMO you've been raiding with for four years. A group chat that's been going since 2019. Someone on a forum who talked you through your divorce at 2am. Those bonds are real. Your brain doesn't care whether you met the person at a coffee shop in Brooklyn or on a Discord server at midnight — the attachment forms the same way through the same neural pathways with the same emotional weight.
So when one of those people dies? Yeah. It wrecks you.
But then you get the fun bonus round of nobody in your offline life understanding why. "You never even met them in person," they say. Cool, thanks, very helpful.
And THEN — because the internet is just the gift that keeps on giving — social media starts resurfacing them. Those "On This Day" memories. Tagged photos from two years ago. The algorithm cheerfully suggesting you check out their profile. A woman I worked with called it "a scab that gets ripped off every single time I open my phone." She'd be having an okay Wednesday, making dinner, and then ping — Instagram shows her a selfie with her friend who died in March, and suddenly it's March again and she's standing in the kitchen crying into a pot of spaghetti.
If this is happening to you: mute the keywords. Turn off memory features. Unfollow what you need to unfollow. I know it feels like betrayal — like if you mute their name you're abandoning them. You're not. You're choosing when to remember instead of letting an algorithm ambush you with it. Huge difference.
So what actually helps? (Not the five stages, I promise)
I'm not going to walk you through denial-anger-bargaining-depression-acceptance. Partly because Elisabeth Kübler-Ross wrote those about people who were dying, not people who were grieving — and somewhere along the way we all collectively forgot that distinction. But mostly because grief doesn't work like a checklist. It's not a straight line. It's more like... you know when your phone GPS reroutes you seventeen times and you end up on some random back road going the wrong direction for a while before eventually, somehow, arriving? It's like that. But less annoying. Actually no, it's more annoying. Never mind, bad analogy.
Here's what I tell people:
Build your own rituals because nobody else is going to. When your grief is disenfranchised — when the loss is a pet or a job or an ex or a friendship — nobody sends flowers. Nobody organizes a meal train. The world just... keeps going, and you're supposed to keep up. So you make your own markers. Write a letter to whatever you lost — you don't have to send it anywhere, just write it. Plant something. Light a candle on the anniversary. One woman I work with makes a $25 donation to the ASPCA every year on March 8th. That's the day her dog Biscuit died. Nobody at the ASPCA knows why she does it. Her husband doesn't even know. The ritual is hers. That's the whole point.
Find your people, even if you have to look hard. Therapy is great. I'll always push for therapy. But there's this thing that happens in a peer support group — where you sit in a room or a Zoom call with people who've lost the same kind of thing you've lost — and somebody says "yeah, me too" and something just... cracks open. That's not a metaphor, I mean it physically, like you can feel something release in your chest. Study out of Johns Hopkins (2023) found peer support groups cut depression scores by about 22% in people dealing with unrecognized loss. Not nothing. If you want to find one, we put together a guide on grief support groups that lists some good starting points.
Quit telling yourself your grief doesn't count. I know. Easier said than done. You've probably got years of internalized messaging — from family, from coworkers, from society at large — telling you this wasn't a "real" loss, other people have it worse, you should be over it. All of that? Garbage. I mean it. Total garbage. Grief is not a competition and there's no threshold of tragedy you have to clear before you earn the right to feel bad. You feel it? Then it's real. End of story.
Things people say that make it worse (even with good intentions)
"You can always get another dog."
I want to be measured about this but honestly that sentence makes my blood pressure spike every time I hear it. Because what you're really saying — maybe without meaning to — is that the specific creature they loved, with its specific weird habits and its specific warm weight on their lap every evening, was interchangeable. Replaceable. Like a toaster. Nobody would say "you can always get another mother" and yet somehow "you can always get another dog" is considered reasonable.
Also. The phrase "at least." At least you have other children. At least she's not suffering anymore. At least you had 14 good years. I want to grab every person who's ever said "at least" to a grieving person and just — I don't know — make them sit with how that sentence actually lands. Every one of those "at leasts" is slamming a door shut. It's saying: here's why your pain shouldn't be as bad as it is. Stop it. Just... stop it.
Oh, and one more thing while I'm on my soapbox. Feeling relief when someone dies doesn't make you a terrible person. If you spent three years watching your father die of Alzheimer's, or if you had an abusive parent, or if the relationship was complicated and painful and exhausting — relief is normal. Expected, even. And it can exist right alongside sadness. Same moment, same breath. Grief is weird like that. Big enough to hold two opposite feelings at once.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it normal to grieve something that wasn't a death?
I feel like I'm grieving "wrong." Is that a thing?
Can you grieve an ex-partner or someone you were estranged from?
Why does losing someone I only knew online hurt so much?
What's the best thing I can say to someone going through this?
Where to go from here
Look. If you got to the bottom of this article and parts of it made your throat tight or your eyes sting — that's not a coincidence and it's not weakness. That's recognition. And it means the thing you lost mattered, even if nobody around you treated it that way.
You don't need to do anything dramatic right now. Seriously. Maybe just... sit with the fact that your grief is legitimate. That it has a name — disenfranchised grief — and that thousands and thousands of people are walking around carrying the exact same invisible weight. You're not alone in this even though it absolutely, positively feels like you are.
If you want to talk to somebody (and I think you should, eventually, when you're ready), we wrote up a comparison of grief counseling vs therapy that might help you figure out what kind of support would actually fit your situation — because they're not the same thing and nobody explains the difference clearly enough.
And if you're here because you're trying to support someone else through this kind of loss? The best thing you can do — the absolute best, bar none — is just believe them. They say it hurts? It hurts. That's it. That's the whole job.
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
Informational Purposes Only
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, medical, or financial advice. Laws, costs, and requirements vary by location and individual circumstances. Always consult with qualified legal, medical, or financial professionals for advice specific to your situation.
Written by End of Life Tools Editorial Team
Editorial Team
Our editorial team researches end-of-life planning topics using government and industry sources to provide accurate, clearly sourced guidance for families.
View full profile →


